Complaint·September 9, 2025

During the interview , RP stated that C1 was struck by another child with the toy. Per RP statement it was during pick up time, when she observed C1 through the window smiling , by the time RP parked and reached the door she observed C1 was crying and licensee comforting and providing first aid. RP stated C1 sustain injury on his forehead and corner of eye. C1 was taken to the hospital, photo of injury and discharge report was provided to LPA. Per RP, upon arrival she was informed by the licensee that C1 was struck by C2 with the toy. According to the report RP was referred to file a report with local law enforcement. RP stated no report was filed. During the interview ,Licensee confirmed that incident happened during the pickup time when she was assisting another parent with pick up. Per licensee, she observed C1 and C2 standing in front of each other when C2 hit C1 with the toy car. Picture of the toy car was obtained during the interview and additional pictures were submitted to LPA by the licensee. Parent #3 , who was present for pick up, stated she observed the incident while waiting for her child . She confirmed she saw one child hit another child with the toy. Per parent #3, child was assisted immediately. During this investigation, LPA obtained information regarding the toy car used by C2 to hit C1 .Based on the product description toy car was for ages 3 and up . Based on LPAs interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 12 , Chapter 1 ), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. An exit Interview was conducted, copy of this report along with Notice of Site visit and Appeal Rights were explained and provided to the Licensee , Xiao Ji Huang on 09/09/2025. Page 2 of 2 No pictures were provided. Licensee confirmed that C1 scratched his leg while was playing outside and described as minor injury. RP alleged that the licensee did not report the incident until specifically asked. The licensee stated that parents are notified immediately if incident is significant, otherwise she notifies them during pick up. Additional parents were interviewed, and no disclosures were made to support allegations. Based on the investigation , although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. An exit Interview was conducted, copy of this report along with Notice of Site visit and Appeal Rights were explained and provided to the Licensee , Xiao Ji Huang on 09/09/25. Page 2 of 2