Complaint·September 24, 2025

Reporting Party states that due to being over ratio children are getting injured, though parent interviews did not corroborate the allegation. During parent interviews, information disclosed varied. One out of four parents stated that their child had been bitten by another child and was not informed, while the other three parents reported that their children had not been injured while in care at the family childcare home. All parents reported being satisfied with the care their children receive and had no additional concerns. Per Licensee\342\200\231s interview, she stated that she does have a child in her care that tends to bite children but that she has spoken to the parent and is working with the child and mother to help prevent it. Licensee states she lets parents know when this type of incident occurs. Per Licensee\342\200\231s husband\342\200\231s interview, he did not disclose any information to corroborate the above allegations. Throughout LPA\342\200\231s inspections, LPA consistently observed 2 or more adults present in the home supervising the children. The LPA also verified that all adults observed in the home have obtained fingerprint clearance. Based on LPA\342\200\231s observation, interviews and reviewing documentation, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore at this time the above allegations are Unsubstantiated. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Exit interview was conducted with Licensee Xiaoshan He. Appeal rights were provided.