Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

LA CRESCENTA MONTESSORILicense 198021594
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

LPA interviewed parent, who disclosed observing an exterminator company employee in the paly area during the pick-up inspecting the area, but they did not observe them spraying the area. LPA conducted interviews with staff members, additional parents and contacted the extermination company used by the facility. According to the records and invoices provided by the exterminator company, the facility was serviced on December 9, 2025, and again on December 22, 2025. Spraying occurred on December 22, 2025, between the hours of 5:00 PM and 6:04 PM, as noted in the invoice. During the interview ,Staff 3 (S3) reported seeing an employee from the extermination company in the facility between 5:45 PM and 6:20 PM. S3 confirmed that the facility was sprayed after the children had left. No disclosures were obtained from the parents regarding this matter. Based on the investigation, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit Interview was conducted, copy of this report along with Notice of Site visit and Appeal Rights were explained and provided to the Facility Representative, Araceli Guzman on 02/23/2026. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Page 2 of 2

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • PERSONAL RIGHTS

  • 101212(d)Type B

    REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

    101212(d)ReportingRequirements(d)Upon the occurrence... of any of the events specified in (d)(1) below, a report shall be made... within the Department's next working day and during its normal business hours.A written report ...shall be submitted to the Department... This requirement not met evidenced by: In September of last year parent reported regarding child getting dislocated elbow. On 12/30/2025, another child was pinched in the facility that was reported by the parent. Facility failed to report incidents, required by section 101212(d), which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 23, 2026 inspection of LA CRESCENTA MONTESSORI?

This was a complaint inspection of LA CRESCENTA MONTESSORI on February 23, 2026. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to LA CRESCENTA MONTESSORI on February 23, 2026?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.