Skip to main content
ReadyRule homepageReadyRule

Inspection visit

complaint

ARGUEDAS PASARA, PAMELALicense 214005622
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On December 20, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nathan Garcia conducted a subsequent complaint inspection in response to the above complaint allegations. LPA met with Licensee, Pamela Arguedas and explained purpose of inspection. Present during the visit are 4 infant children in care, including the Licensee's granddaughter with the Licensee and her adult daughter, son, and husband. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted and relevant documents were gathered. Based on the interviews and relevant documents, there was no sufficient evidence to prove the above allegations. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Exit interview was conducted with Licensee, Pamela Arguedas. Report and Notice of Site Visit was provided. Notice of Site Visit will be posted for 30 days.

Citations

4 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 102116.5d(1)Type A

    102416.5 Staffing Ratio and Capacity(d) For a Large Family Child Care Home, the maximum number of children for whom care may be provided at any one time when there is an assistant provider in the home, including children under age 10 who reside at the licensee's home and the assistant provider's children under age 10, shall be either:(1) Twelve children, no more than four of whom may be infants; orThis requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on the interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the above-referenced section. The licensee was operating with more than 4 infants during the time the complaint was received. Which poses an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 102416.2(e)(5)Type B

    102416.2 Reporting Requirements(e) The written report shall be either Form LIC 624B (8/06) Unusual Incident/Injury report-Family Child Care Home, or a letter that includes the following information, in addition to that required by Health and Safety Code Sections 1597.467(b)(2)(A) through (b)(2)(D):(5) Description of how the incident or injury happened and name of the child(ren) or adult(s) that may have been involved as well as any steps taken to prevent the incident or injury from recurring.This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on the interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the above-referenced section. The licensee failed to submit a written report of the incident, which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 102417d(1)Type B

    102417 Operation of a Family Child Care Home(d) The home shall provide safe toys, play equipment and materials.(1) Fixtures, furniture and equipment that have been banned or recalled by the United States Consumer Protection Safety Commission shall not be used for children in care or accessible to children in care.This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on the interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the above-referenced section. LPA observed an exersaucer was in the day care area. Licensee states that the exersaucer was given by a parent for their child to use in the day care, which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 102421a(1)Type B

    102421 Child's Records(a) The licensee shall maintain, in each child's record, the signed and dated notice form required in Section 102419(d).(1) The licensee shall keep the signed and dated notice form for at least three years following termination of service to the child.This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on the interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the above-referenced section. The licensee states that she threw away the files of the children. Which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 20, 2024 inspection of ARGUEDAS PASARA, PAMELA?

This was a complaint inspection of ARGUEDAS PASARA, PAMELA on December 20, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to ARGUEDAS PASARA, PAMELA on December 20, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.