Complaint·January 15, 2026

A1 stated that they did not directly observe any instances of C1 banging their own head on the floor but was told about it by LS. During interviews with parents, P7 stated that C7 fed in a highchair while enrolled at the facility and C7 didn’t show any change in feeding behavior at home. During interviews with LS, A1, LS stated there have not been any children in the last year who used a highchair and A1 stated that they don't remember any children using a highchair since A1 has been assisting. No other parents interviewed stated their children used a high chair at the facility. During interviews with parents and adults, P6, P7, P8, P10, and A2 stated that they did not have any concerns with the cleanliness level of the home or of their children after pick up. During visits on 9/12/25, 10/21/25, 11/24/25, and 1/15/26, LPA observed that both LS and A1 present in the home, operating within ratio requirements. LPA observed that the was facility was clean and did not contain any visible filth. During interviews with parents and adults, P8 stated that LS told her she usually has 14 children present, P7 stated that she has not seen more than 8 children at one time, and P6 stated that she usually sees five or six children during pick up and drop off. LS stated that she currently has 10 children enrolled, has not had 14 children enrolled since summer of 2025, and that she would never care for children beyond her capacity. A1 stated that LS and A1 are always present in the home together. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated. Appeal rights were provided and exit interview conducted. The Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 days.