Skip to main content
ReadyRule homepageReadyRule

Inspection visit

Follow-up

SALAZAR, MARIA & MIGUEL FCCLicense 2439085371 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 09/18/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) KA Vang conducted an unannounced case management-other inspection. LPA toured the facility indoor and outdoor, and a census was taken. LPA met with Licensee Maria Salazar and explained the purpose of today's inspection was to discuss the amended LIC809 and LIC809-D pages. On 04/03/2024, an unannounced annual inspection was conducted, and a deficiency was cited. Per administrative review, the deficiency was determined to be dismissed. LPA amended the LIC809 and LIC809-D pages. During this inspection, LPA completed the new LIC809 and LIC809-D pages with the new deficiency of Type B as Licensees provided evidence that they have made attempts to have the adult household member completed a background clearance to be associated with this facility. During today\342\200\231s inspection, LPA provided the amended report and the new report to Licensees Maria Salazar. Per Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations, a deficiency is being cited during today\342\200\231s inspection. (See LIC809-D page) Licensee Maria Salazar was provided a copy of appeal rights. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with Licensee Maria Salazar.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1596.871(c)(1)(A)Type B

    Criminal Record Clearance Requirements - Initial Clearance

    Subsequent to initial licensure, a person specified in subdivision (b) who is not exempt from fingerprinting shall obtain either a criminal record clearance or an exemption from disqualification, pursuant to subdivision (f) of this section or Section 1522.7, from the State Department of Social Services prior to employment, residence, or initial presence in the facility.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the licensees did not compliance with the section cited above. LPA observed an adult household member (Staff #3(S3) live in the home with no background clearance associated with this facility. Licensees provided evidence that they have made attempts to have S3’s fingerprint background cleared. This poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to children in care. *This is an amended report.”

    Read full inspector narrative

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 18, 2024 inspection of SALAZAR, MARIA & MIGUEL FCC?

This was a other inspection of SALAZAR, MARIA & MIGUEL FCC on September 18, 2024. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to SALAZAR, MARIA & MIGUEL FCC on September 18, 2024?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "Subsequent to initial licensure, a person specified in subdivision (b) who is not exempt from fingerprinting shall obtai..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.