Skip to main content
ReadyRule homepageReadyRule

Inspection visit

Incident investigation

MONO LEE VINING PRESCHOOLLicense 2638019651 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 10/22/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Crystal Ali met with Teacher Julia Vargas to conduct an unannounced case management (CM) inspection. The purpose of the case management was to follow up on unusual incident report (UIR) received 9/10/25. Incident occurred on 9/10/25, C1 had a seizure during naptime. Teacher Vargas notified the parent and called 911. Parent arrived before paramedics and administered C1 medication. Paramedics transport C1 and parent to hospital. C1 returned to preschool on 9/16/25. C1 is on new medication starting 10/14/25. Upon arrival, LPA observed 4 preschool children and 1 staff providing care and supervision. During this inspection LPA conducted interview with teacher and C1. LPA obtained copy of LIC 500. CM findings show that the facility followed CCR and HSC guidelines for UIR reporting incident and supervision. However, facility did not follow regulation CCR 101221 (b)(10)-record of current medications, including the name of the prescribing physician, and instructions, regarding control and custody of medications. Deficiency has been cited. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Exit interview conducted with Lead Teacher, Julia Vargas.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 101216(g)(1)Type B

    PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS

  • 101221(b)(10)Type B

    (10) Record of current medications, including the name of the prescribing physician, and instructions, ...regarding control and custody of medications.This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility representative did not have the proper authorization from doctor and parent regarding current medication records in (from 10/14/25) child file during inspection, which poses an immediate risk to the health safety and personal rights of the clientsin care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 22, 2025 inspection of MONO LEE VINING PRESCHOOL?

This was a other inspection of MONO LEE VINING PRESCHOOL on October 22, 2025. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to MONO LEE VINING PRESCHOOL on October 22, 2025?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B).

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.