Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Follow-up

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 5/14/2024, at 8:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Dean Thompson conducted an unannounced Case Management inspection. LPA toured the facility and met with Administrative Assistant Brittany Paepke and advised Brittany the purpose of the inspection. LPA was provided a tour of the facility. There were 24 preschool age children in care with 6 staff at the time of the inspection. During the inspection it was determined the facility is operating within its licensed capacity and within compliance of staffing ratios. A review of the Facility Personnel Report Summary on this date indicates all facility staff or other individuals who require caregiver background checks have received criminal record and child abuse index clearances or exemptions. On 5/6/2024, Director Amy Rivas contacted Community Care Licensing (CCL) to self-report an incident of child-on-child inappropriate interaction. On 5/2/2024, during bath time, parent #1 (P1) observed child #1 (C1) with purple markings on the genitals and between the buttocks. On 5/6/2024, per the self reported incident submitted, staff #2 mentioned they were unsure if the incident happened at all but was going off of the information provided by C1. On 5/7/2024, LPA contacted P1 via phone call. P1 agreed to provide LPA with additional information pertaining to the incident. LPA did not receive the information requested from P1. LPA followed up with P1 via email as well as phone calls and did not get a response. On 5/15/2024, LPA interviewed staff #1 (S1). S1 stated they did not see the incident occur and was made aware of the incident from S2. Continue to page 2 Page 2 Based on the information provided on the self reported incident and interview with S1, there was not enough evidence to determine if the incident occurred at the facility. In the areas that were evaluated, no deficiencies were observed of the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12 at the time of the visit. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with Brittany Paepke. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 15, 2024 inspection of OUR SAVIOR'S LUTHERAN PRESCHOOL?

This was a other inspection of OUR SAVIOR'S LUTHERAN PRESCHOOL on May 15, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to OUR SAVIOR'S LUTHERAN PRESCHOOL on May 15, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.