complaint·July 20, 2021

LPA interviewed several parents on 7/19/21. Parents stated that they were not witness to any issues at the facility nor had any concerns at the facility and had generally positive responses for their experience with the facility. LPA also interviewed five children on 7/20/21. From the information obtained from the children interviews, it was not determined that the facility had violated supervision regulations, related to the allegation. From these interviews, there was insufficient information to create a preponderance of evidence to support this allegation. Based on all this information the preponderance of evidence standard for this allegation was not met, therefore the above allegation is found to be unsubstantiated. From all of the available information obtained by LPA during the course of the investigation, there is insufficient evidence staff did not adequately supervise children. Based on all of the information LPA was able to obtain during the course of their investigation, LPA was not able to determine that this allegation was false or untrue. Therefore, LPA cannot make the determination that this allegation is unfounded and the most accurate finding, based on the information obtained during the investigation, would remain at unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Exit interview was conducted, and report was reviewed and discussed. Notice of Site Visit was posted during the visit. The facility representative was informed that the Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to post will result in civil penalties of $100 per day. The facility was provided a copy of their appeal rights (LIC 9058 12/15) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights.