Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

CHILDTIME CHILDREN'S CENTERLicense 304270268
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

During the course of investigation, LPA interviewed the Director, 3 staff, 3 parents, 3 children, and reviewed records. During the staff interview, LPA discovered that on 8/3/2023 the facility took the children to the Splash Pad. Staff #1 (S1) witnessed Child #1(C1) climbed and slipped on the monkey bar. S1 asked if C1 was ok and C1 stated C1 hurt C1\342\200\231s private part, but C1 was fine. They returned back to the facility at approximately 12:00pm. At around 3pm, C1 started to complain about the injury. S1 informed the director about the incident when C1 started to complain about injury. Director immediately called C1\342\200\231s mother and provided the parent with the incident report when parent picked up C1. During the initial inspection dated 8/8/23, LPA Duron reviewed incident report dated 8/3/23 which indicated C1 fell from the monkey bar at Splash Pad. The incident report was reviewed and signed by Director and dated 8/3/23. The incident report was signed by parent on 8/3/23. Director stated the parent was given a copy and a copy of the incident report was retained in the child's records. LPA Duron contacted and interviewed 3 parents. All interviewed parents stated they did not have any concern with facility. Based on the information gathered from LPAs\342\200\231 interviews, observation, and reviewing records, there is insufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation s of staff did not report incident to responsible party in a timely manner. Although the allegation s may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the allegation s did or did not occur in the day care facility, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was completed. The report was reviewed and discussed. Appeal Rights were provided. The facility representative was provided a copy of their appeal rights and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. All appeals must be in writing and received by the Licensing office within 15 business days. Any proposed changes to the physical plant, including telephone number, shall be immediately reported to the Department.The facility representative was informed that the \342\200\234Notice of Site Visit\342\200\235 must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to post will result in Civil Penalties of $100.00. The \342\200\234Notice of Site Visit\342\200\235 must be posted on or adjacent to the door. Page 2 of 2. End of Report.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 2, 2023 inspection of CHILDTIME CHILDREN'S CENTER?

This was a complaint inspection of CHILDTIME CHILDREN'S CENTER on October 2, 2023. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to CHILDTIME CHILDREN'S CENTER on October 2, 2023?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.