Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

KINDERCARE LEARNING CENTERLicense 304270380
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

During the course of investigation, LPA interviewed 5 staff members and 2 parents. LPA did not interview children due to children being nonverbal. During the staff interviews, Staff 1 (S1) stated, the facility protocol when a child has lice is, that staff call the parent, of the infected child and ask them to pick up the child and do treatment. The staff tell the parents to treat the child and make sure there isn’t anything alive before they return to school. Staff would then double check what rooms the child was in and start cleaning and laundering everything. Staff would also notify parents through the app. Staff would also check the other children. On August 3, 2023, a staff did discover that a child in Preschool B classroom had lice. The child was sent home and other children were checked. A letter was sent to parents on the app notifying them and staff were instructed to check other children and launder and sanitize everything in the classrooms. Staff 2 (S2) said When a child is found to have lice, they are sent to the office, the child gets checked for the lice and then get sent home. Staff then launder everything, and staff clean and sanitize and spray everything down, vacuum. Then the admin send a letter letting parents know. One child got lice in the summer and their parents took them home that same day. As far as S2 knows no other parents reported their child contracting lice from the one child at the facility. Staff 3 (S3) disclosed the procedure for lice is, the facility send the child/children home and staff clean up the rooms and do all the sanitizing and all that. As far as a child recently having lice, S3 stated, a child from the infant classroom was sent home out of precaution. As far as S3 knows, that child did not have it but because S3’s student’s sibling had lice, it was decided that the siblings be sent home to out of precaution. Staff 4 (S4) says, “It is S4’s understanding the procedure for lice is that the infected child immediately gets sent home and parents/staff are notified. Staff then launder and bag everything and disinfect everything. Sometime in August a sibling of my student’s had gotten lice. Out of precaution my student and the other sibling were sent home as well.” S4 did not hear of any other children getting lice and does not feel any other children were exposed because S4’s student did not get it even though S4’s student’s sibling did. Staff 5 (S5) disclosed that staff were told that a child cannot be sent home unless there are live lice. Page 2 of 3 Then the staff send a notice to the parents notifying them of the incident. Staff then wash all the soft toys, blankets and clean extra. S5 said there were 3 children that had gotten lice and they were sent home. One of the siblings was brought back to school but S5 saw one live lice so the child was sent back home. LPA received a copy of the letter that was emailed to parents notifying them of the lice incident and the post that was sent on the KinderCare app. LPA also verified staff timecards and student sign in/out sheets. 2 of 4 parents were interviewed, parents had no issues or concerns with the daycare. Based on the information gathered from LPAs’ interviews, observation, and reviewing records, there is insufficient evidence to corroborate the allegations of A daycare who has lice was allowed to stay in the classroom and Daycare children are being exposed to lice. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur; therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview was conducted, and report was reviewed and discussed. Notice of Site Visit was posted during the visit. The facility representative was informed that the Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to post will result in civil penalties of $100 per day. The facility was provided a copy of their appeal rights (LIC 9058 12/15) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. Page 3 of 3. End of Report.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 6, 2023 inspection of KINDERCARE LEARNING CENTER?

This was a complaint inspection of KINDERCARE LEARNING CENTER on November 6, 2023. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to KINDERCARE LEARNING CENTER on November 6, 2023?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.