Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

CYPRESS MONTESSORI ACADEMYLicense 3042706992 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

(page 2) RP also disclosed observing a staff not properly supervising children on the playground by allowing the children to use the playground equipment incorrectly, children were observed walking up the slide. During the investigation LPA Lucero interviewed 4 staff members, 5 parents, conducted a facility inspection, and reviewed the children’s roster. During the investigation on 10/02/2023, LPA Lucero interviewed 4 staff. Staff #1 (S1) stated since the beginning of employment, they have been unaware of issues with the facility entrance gate, the gate is closed at all times and staff make sure of it. S1 disclosed staff are stationed at the corners of the playground and feels the supervision on the playground is good. Staff #2 (S2) stated there is no issue with the facility entrance gate, the only changes to the gate was the gate code. S2 disclosed staff are always watching the children on the playground and ensure children are not fighting with each other. Staff #3 (S3) stated there have been no issues with the gate. S3 disclosed the supervision on the playground is good and especially when children are near the swings. Staff #4 (S4) disclosed there was a slight issue with the gate not latching but was fixed and is now working properly. S4 stated the gate took some time to get repaired. S4 also disclosed with the change in staff, S4 noticed the children were walking up the slides. S4 stated no children have been hurt. Staff were reminded to give children reminders that they have to go up the stairs and down the slide. On 10/02/2023, LPA Lucero inspected the facility entrance gate that is located between the children’s playground and facility parking lot and observed gate latching and in good repair. On 10/23/2023 LPA attempted to interview 7 parents, however only 5 parents were available for interview. All of the parents interviewed are satisfied with the childcare facility and did not have any concerns. Based on LPAs facility inspection, interviews conducted with 4 staff, 5 parents, it has been determined (1) Facility gate is in disrepair and (2) Staff are not properly supervising day care children. Therefore, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, 101229 (a) Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision and 101238(a) Buildings and Grounds are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. (continue to page 3) (page 3) Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the Director Rebecca Ruiz. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Appeal Rights were explained. The Licensee was provided a copy of appeal rights (LIC 9058 01/16) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. All appeals must be in writing and received by the Regional Office within 15 business days. First level appeals should be sent to the regional manager to the address listed above. End of Report. (page 2) During the investigation LPA Lucero interviewed 4 staff members, 5 parents and reviewed the children’s roster. During the investigation on 10/02/2023, LPA Lucero interviewed 4 staff. 4 out of 4 staff interviewed stated they are unaware of any COVID-19 exposures that occurred in the facility. The Department didn’t receive any notice from the facility about COVID-19 as is required. On 10/23/2023 LPA attempted to interview 7 parents, however only 5 parents were available for interview. All of the parents interviewed are satisfied with the childcare facility and did not have any concerns. Based on LPAs interviews conducted with 4 staff, 5 parents, it has been determined there was insufficient evidence that staff are not effectively communicating with day care children's parents. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the Director Rebecca Ruiz. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Appeal Rights were explained. The Licensee was provided a copy of appeal rights (LIC 9058 01/16) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. All appeals must be in writing and received by the Regional Office within 15 business days. First level appeals should be sent to the regional manager to the address listed above. End of Report.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • PERSONAL RIGHTS

    101223 Personal Rights (a) The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights (3) To be free from corporal or unusual punishment, infliction of pain, humiliation, intimidation.... This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on interviews conducted it has been determined staff handle children in a rough manner and staff yell at children. This is an immediate risk to the safety of the children in care.

  • 101229(a)Type B

    RESPONSIBILITY FOR PROVIDING CARE AND SUPERVISION

    101229 Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision (a)The licensee shall provide care and supervision as necessary to meet the children's needs. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on interviews conducted. It has been determined that staff were not supervising children on the playground by allowing children to walk up the slide. This poses potential Health and Safety risk to children in care.

  • 101238(a)Type B

    BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS

    101238 Buildings and Grounds (a) the child care center shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times to ensure the safety and well-being of children, employees, and visitors. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on interviews conducted. It has been determined that the facility gate that is located between the children’s playground and the facility parking lot was in disrepair. This poses potential Health and Safety risk to children in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 27, 2023 inspection of CYPRESS MONTESSORI ACADEMY?

This was a complaint inspection of CYPRESS MONTESSORI ACADEMY on October 27, 2023. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to CYPRESS MONTESSORI ACADEMY on October 27, 2023?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (0 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "101223 Personal Rights (a) The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights (3) To be..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.