Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

KIM, TAEYONGLicense 3043142241 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

(Page 2) On 1/6/2026, the Orange County Regional Office received a complaint with one (1) allegation listed above: Reporting Party (RP) alleged that licensee did not notify the department prior to change in "off limits" areas. On 1/9/2026, LPAs S. Jung and A. Castro made an unannounced visit to the facility for an initial complaint investigation. LPAs observed that facility was operating over capacity and had two assistants who did not have criminal record clearances yet were providing care to day care children. Deficiencies were cited on respective LIC 9099 Complaint Investigation Report and LIC 809 Case Management – Deficiencies Report, both dated 1/9/2026. Licensee provided LPAs with facility roster and additional documents for investigative review. Due to time constraints, LPAs could not conduct staff and child interviews. On 1/9/2026, LPAs S. Jung and A. Castro observed three (3) children napping in an off-limits area of living room 2 where the exit door is located. However, during the prelicensing visit which occurred on 11/9/2023, it was stated by licensee that the left side of living room 2 with exit door would be off-limits to day care children. LPA K. Navar who conducted the prelicensing appointment included this information in the prelicensing report. On 2/27/2026, staff interviewed stated that the left side of living room 2 is used, on occasion, during nap time if there is a child who is crying a lot. They have taken children who are crying a lot to this side to not disturb the other children napping in living room 1. Also, staff interviewed stated that the garage has been used in the past for children’s music and dance time. Licensee was cited for not reporting change from an area of the family child care home previously identified as "off limits" to an area where care and supervision will be provided to children in care; see LIC 9099D for deficiency. Parents interviewed did not provide any information regarding the allegations listed above. Children could not be interviewed due to their age and language development. (Go to Page 3) (Page 3) The Orange County Regional Child Care Licensing Office has investigated the complaint alleging licensee did not notify the department prior to change in "off limits" areas. Based on information gathered from LPA’s interviews and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegation is substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12 & Chapter 3 was cited; see LIC 9099D for deficiency. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the Licensee, Taeyong Kim. LPA Jung provided Korean interpretation throughout the visit. LPA Lucero provided Spanish interpretation for a portion of the visit.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • Family Day Care Homes

    1597.622(a)(1) General Provisions and Definitions. Commencing September 1, 2016, a person shall not be employed or volunteer at a family day care home if he or she has not been immunized against influenza, pertussis, and measles...This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that, during LPA's visit on 1/16/26, licensee did not have proof of immunization against influenza, pertussis, and measles for A2, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING BUILDING OR GROUNDS

    102416.3(a)(6) Alterations to Existing Buildings or Grounds. Any change from an area of the family child care home previously identified as "off limits" to an area where care and supervision will be provided to children in care. This requirement was not as evidenced by: Based on observation and interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that, licensee used an off limit area of living room 2 and the garage for day care children, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 27, 2026 inspection of KIM, TAEYONG?

This was a complaint inspection of KIM, TAEYONG on February 27, 2026. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to KIM, TAEYONG on February 27, 2026?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "1597.622(a)(1) General Provisions and Definitions. Commencing September 1, 2016, a person shall not be employed or volun..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.