Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

RED HILL MONTESSORI PRESCHOOLLicense 3043700091 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Page 2. On 06/10/2025, a complaint was filed with the Department allegation are (1) Staff handled day care child in care in a rough manner. (2) Staff caused injury to day care child in care. During the investigation, LPA Trinh conducted a physical plant inspection and interviewed four (4) staff members and five (5) children, and three (5) parents. LPA Trinh also obtained pertinent documents. Regarding allegation (1), Staff handled the daycare child in care in a rough manner. During the staff interviews, four (4) interviewed staff members described how to provide positive discipline for the children in care, including positive giving redirections, offering choices, and encouraging the children to make positive choices. However, Staff #2 (S2) stated in the interview and provided a declaration that while trying to prevent Child 5 (C5) from hitting other children in the classroom, S2 became physically involved and was rough in their maneuver, which caused the child to get hurt. LPA interviewed five (5) children. During the interviews, C5 provided a statement regarding getting hurt by S2 and pointed out to the LPA the location where and how S2 hurt C5. During record review, Facility Handbook Policy\342\200\231s guidance strategies states, \342\200\234Positive guidance and discipline are crucial because they promote children\342\200\231s self-control, teach children responsibility, and help children make thoughtful choices\342\200\235. Based on this policy and statement provided by S2, S2 did not follow the facility\342\200\231s policy regarding guidance strategies. Regarding allegation (2) Staff caused injury to day care child in care. All four (4) interviewed staff members stated that there was a written incident report which revealed that C5 was sustained a bruised elbow and redness on the forehead during the incident. On 7/25/2025, LPA called five (5) parents requesting an interview. The parents interviewed did not express any concerns related to the allegations and did not provide any information that could corroborate the allegations. Continued Page 3. Page 3. Based on the information gathered from LPA's interviews and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the allegations (1) Staff handled day care child in care in a rough manner, and (2) Staff caused injury to day care child in care are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, 101223(a)(2) Personal Rights are being cited on the attached LIC9099D. An exit interview was conducted with Director Weerakkody, Padmin. Notice of Site Visit was posted during the visit. Director Weerakkody, Padmin , was informed that the notice of site visit must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to post will result in civil penalties of $100. Director Weerakkody, Padmin was provided with a copy of their appeal rights (LIC 9058) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. First level appeals should be sent to the regional manager to the address listed above. End of the Report.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • PERSONAL RIGHTS

    101223(a)(2) Personal Rights (a) The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights: (2) To be accorded safe, healthful, and comfortable accommodations, furnishings, and equipment to meet his/her needs. This requirement was not met evidence by... Based on interviews and record reviews, it was determined that S2 roughly handled C5 and caused C5 to sustain injuries, while C5 had conflicts with other children in care, which poses a potential Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to persons in care..

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 6, 2025 inspection of RED HILL MONTESSORI PRESCHOOL?

This was a complaint inspection of RED HILL MONTESSORI PRESCHOOL on August 6, 2025. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to RED HILL MONTESSORI PRESCHOOL on August 6, 2025?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "101223(a)(2) Personal Rights (a) The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights: (2..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.