Complaint·December 9, 2022

(Page 2 of 2) During initial visit on 09/30/2022, LPA interviewed Teacher 1 (T1) as Director, Peggy Metz was not at the facility. T1 stated she gave RP the initial tour of the facility and provided all necessary documents within the application packet. The subject child was enrolled on 09/06/2022. On one occasion, an authorized representative arrived to pick up the child, but the facility was not notified. T1 attempted to call RP but they did not answer. The other parent was waiting in the car and was able to sign out the child. Once the facility spoke with RP, they requested that the representative would only be authorized in case of an emergency. Based on the interviews conducted with Teacher 1, there was insufficient evidence to corroborate the allegations of staff denied release of daycare child to authorized pick up person. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Exit interview was conducted with Director Peggy Metz. Report was reviewed and discussed. Notice of Site Visit was posted during the visit. The facility representative was informed that the Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to post will result in civil penalties of $100 per day. The facility was provided a copy of their appeal rights (LIC 9058) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. (End of Report)