Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

CROSSPOINTE-IKIDS PRESCHOOLLicense 3043708781 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Page 2 During the investigation, LPA Garcia interviewed staff, children, and children’s authorized representatives, obtained facility app correspondence, family handbook, 7/3/25 incident report, and children’s roster. All staff interviewed stated they provide adequate supervision at all times. Four staff interviewed stated that they have not observed child on child interactions that were inappropriate. Staff 5 (S5) disclosed that there was an incident between two children where authorized representatives expressed concerns. S5 stated that they spoke with children involved and concluded the allegations lacked evidence due to interviews involving differing disclosures.All staff interviewed stated that when children have bullying incidents or situations they speak with children, teach them how to treat others with respect, discuss incidents with parents, and inform management for extra support. All staff stated they report incidents via the app, or an incident report and the director is available to step into the classrooms as well. Children interviewed stated that they like day-care, and like playing with friends. Children stated when they get hurt their teacher takes care of them. Children stated when other children are mean they feel sad and tell their teacher. Throughout the investigation, LPA interviewed children’s authorized representatives. Representatives interviewed shared no disclosures regarding the allegations. LPA reviewed app correspondence between the facility and authorized representatives stated that they have various concerns with the facility. LPA reviewed the incident report which states on 7/3/25 there was an alleged child on child interaction. Authorized representatives attempted to speak with Staff 5 (S5) regarding the incident but were unable to. Continued on Page 3 Page 3 Per facility behavior policy, children must follow directions, respect others, be cooperative, deal with frustrations, ask what they need and follow social behavior in a group setting. The policy states that the following behaviors will not be tolerated and could cause immediate termination without notice: Refusing to follow teacher directions, hitting, threats, scratching, bullying, kicking, swearing, biting. Policy states the facility will inform parents through written and or verbal communication, app and calls. Based on interviews and record review, the allegation that staff did not provide adequate supervision to day care children is unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the Director, Nellie Joustra. No deficiencies cited. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Page 2 LPA made multiple attempts to contact RP but was unable to interview the Reporting Party (RP) for further information. During the investigation, LPA Garcia interviewed staff, children, and children’s authorized representatives, obtained facility correspondence, family handbook, 7/3/25 incident report, and children’s roster. Based on interviews, Staff 5 (S5) stated that they did not report the 7/3/25 incident to Department because it did not appear to be an unusual incident. Based on record review, LPA reviewed the correspondence between the facility and authorized representatives stated that they have various concerns with the facility. LPA reviewed the incident report which states on 7/3/25 there was an alleged child on child interaction. Authorized representatives attempted to speak with Staff 5 (S5) regarding the incident but was unable to. The Department was not notified of this unusual incident until the initial visit conducted on 7/15/2025. Throughout the investigation, LPA interviewed children’s authorized representatives. Representatives interviewed shared no disclosures regarding the allegation. Based on record review and interviews, the allegation that facility did not report incident in a timely manner is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 1 Section 101211(d)(1)(C) are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. LPA discussed Reporting Requirements Section 101212(d)(1)(C) and provided a copy to director. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the director, Nellie Joustra. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • HEALTH-RELATED SERVICES

    Based on observation and record review, LPA observed 1 expired medication which poses a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to children in care which poses a potential health, safety,and personal rights risk to children in care.

  • ARTICLE 2. Administration of Child Day Care Licensing

    Based on record review, Staff 1 (S1) and Staff 2 (S2) did not have current and updated Mandated Reporter child care provider certificates on file which poses a potential health, safety,and personal rights risk to children in care.

  • REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

    101212(d)(1)(C) Reporting Requirements: Upon the occurrence, ... (d)(1) below, a report shall be made to ... next working day and during its normal business hours. Any unusual incident or child absence....This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, facility did not report 7/3/2025 incident to the Department in a timely manner which is a potential risk to the personal rights, health and safety to children in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 12, 2025 inspection of CROSSPOINTE-IKIDS PRESCHOOL?

This was a complaint inspection of CROSSPOINTE-IKIDS PRESCHOOL on September 12, 2025. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to CROSSPOINTE-IKIDS PRESCHOOL on September 12, 2025?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "Based on observation and record review, LPA observed 1 expired medication which poses a potential health, safety, and pe..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.