Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Continued from page 1 During the investigation interviews with five teachers were conducted regarding any reports of inappropriate touching occurring between children in care. The teachers nor the director were not made aware of or made aware of any touching occurring between children. The teachers stated that they ensure that supervision is always in place. During the investigation the interviews with the teachers, all teachers stated that supervision is in place both inside and outside of the classroom. The teachers stated that the children are always within direct observation. LPA requested incident reports for the children involved no reports were in any of the children\342\200\231s files as no incidents had occurred. Interview with the child\342\200\231s teacher revealed that if any incidents occur, they generate an incident report and speak with the parents regarding the concern. Interviews were conducted with four children, none of the children made any disclosures about inappropriate touching. LPA interviewed the children in question none of children recalled any incident of inappropriate touching occurring at the day-care center. The child in question was interviewed and could not provide LPA, any details of what occurred, a specific time frame or details to where the incident occurred. Interviews were conducted with four parents none of the parents made any disclosures. LPA spoke to complainant, the complainant was not able to provide LPA with specific information such as dates, or names of any additional children involved. continued on page 3. continued from page 3 Based on interviews conducted with regards to the allegation that the day-care children were inappropriately touched by another child occurred, although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. Exit interview was conducted with Sadyra Weeratunga via Tele-Inspection. Report was read to Director. A copy of the report along with Appeal Rights will be emailed to Licensee with a Read Receipt to acknowledge report was received. Director was asked to respond to email by copying the following, \342\200\234I have read and received the Investigation Report and Appeal Rights, I acknowledge receipt.\342\200\235 All appeals must be in writing and received by the Licensing office within 15 business days. End of report.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 9, 2021 inspection of MONTESSORI ACADEMY OF ANAHEIM, THE?

This was a complaint inspection of MONTESSORI ACADEMY OF ANAHEIM, THE on April 9, 2021. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to MONTESSORI ACADEMY OF ANAHEIM, THE on April 9, 2021?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.