Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

(page two) Four (4) out of four (4) staff interviewed stated that they have not seen, heard or observed staff members not accommodating the needs of children in care. Staff one (S1) stated that providing adequate accommodation for children in care means making sure that the children feel safe and providing care that meets the needs of the child. The Director stated that during the enrollment process that the facility requests parents to submit the needs and services for each child in care. The Director stated that the needs and services plans are updated every few months and if needed or requested by parents. LPA collected and reviewed documentation of the enrollment agreement and parent handbook. The enrollment agreement and parent handbook states that the “personal child history” must be completed and returned no later than the child’s first day of enrollment. The Orange County Regional Child Care Licensing Office investigated the complaint alleging that Staff refused to provide accommodations to child in care. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, based on interviews and record reviews conducted, there was not a preponderance to prove that the allegations did or did not occur, therefore, the allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies cited. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the Director, Dana Davis. End of report

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 101226.1Type A

    101226.1 (a) The licensee shall be responsible for ensuring that children with obvious symptoms of illness including, but not limited to, fever or vomiting, are not accepted. This requirement was not met as evidenced by... Based on interviews four (4) out of four (4) staff members stated that children were allowed to return to school with active lice. This poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 4, 2026 inspection of KIDDIE ACADEMY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH?

This was a complaint inspection of KIDDIE ACADEMY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH on February 4, 2026. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to KIDDIE ACADEMY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH on February 4, 2026?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.