complaint·February 11, 2022

During the course of the investigation, on 12/16/2021, during an inspection of the facility, LPA Torrence entered classroom 102 and classroom 103 and observed two staff not wearing face covering. LPA Torrence asked Staff 2(S2) why she was not wearing a face covering and she replied by saying it\342\200\231s on my person and shrugged her shoulders, then properly placed the face mask on her face. Upon LPA Torrence entering Staff 3(S3) classroom, she observed S3 immediately placing her face mask over her nose and mouth. During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed Staff 1 (S1). S1 stated they try and check staff to ensure they are wearing their face covering. S1 also stated that every staff member knows to wear their mask, while inside the classroom. During the course of the investigation, LPA Torrence contacted 10 parents and interviewed four. Parent 3 (P3) indicated it\342\200\231s been most recent that the teachers and staff started wearing mask other than that P3 had no other issues or concerns with the facility. Interviewed parents had no issues or concerns with the facility. Based on LPA observations and interviews conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12 & Chapter 3, 101223(a)(2) Personal Rights are being cited on the attached LIC9099D. Exit interview was conducted. The Notice of Site Visit was posted. Appeal Rights was explained. A copy of appeal rights (LIC 9058 1/16) will be provided through email and their signatures on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. First level appeal is to Regional Manager, address is above on the report. End of Report