Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

(Page 2 of Report) During the investigation, LPA observed the infant classroom ratio on 08/25/23 and on 10/19/23. LPA interviewed 8 staff members and 6 parents, reviewed facility parent's handbook, documentation regarding incident, and facility camera's footage regarding teacher's communication with parent upon pick-ups. On both unannounced visits on 08/25/23 and on 10/19/23, LPA observed 4 staff members (2 fully qualified infant teachers and 2 assistants) to 10 infants ratio in the infant classroom, facility was in compliance with staff to child ratio. During interviews, all interviewed staff provided consistent responses about asking parents to provide at least 2 extra set of clothes for the infants, to be kept at the facility, and changing for the infants as needed. All interviewed staff denied sending any child home in wet clothes or keeping any child in wet clothes for a long period of time. Staff #1 (S1) reported that on one occasion, C1 sat on a puddle of water and S1 changed clothes for C1 right away, S1 recalled informing parent of the incident an giving the wet bag of clothes to the parent upon pick-up. S1 also reported that S1 and Staff #5 (S5) worked with Child #1 (C1) on 08/17/2023, when S1 witnessed C1 putting C1's hand on the bookshelf near Child #2, and C2 bit on C1's arm. S1 immediately separated C1 and C2 and attended to C1. S1 documented the incident in facility notes and informed S5 of the incident. Later on that day, parent was informed of the incident during pick-up. LPA Tran attempted to interview 10 parents, 6 out of 10 parents responded and was interviewed. 6 out of 6 interviewed parents reported that their child was never sent home in wet clothing and the facility is very communicative about asking for extra clothing. All interviewed parents did not share any concern related to the allegations that are being investigated. During record review, LPA reviewed facility incident notes and verified that the biting incident on 08/17/2023 was documented as reported by S1. In the Parent's handbook, facility stated that parents are responsible to provide extra clothes so that the children can be changed as needed. Video footage from facility camera showed staff's communication with parent daily about C1's behaviors. One of the video footage showed that S1 communicated with parent about C1 sitting on a puddle of water during outside time and staff changed C1's clothes, S1 handed C1's wet clothes in a plastic bag to parent during pick up. (Continue next page) (Page 3 of Report) Based on the information gathered from LPA's observations on 08/25/23 and on 10/19/23, interviews with 8 staff members and 6 parents, and record reviews of facility's documentation regarding incident, Parent's Handbook and facility's camera footage, there is insufficient evidence to corroborate the allegations (1) Staff left child in wet clothing for an extended period of time and (2) due to lack of supervision, child bit another child. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove (1) Staff left child in wet clothing for an extended period of time and (2) due to lack of supervision, child bit another child did or did not occur, therefore the allegations regarding (1) Staff left child in wet clothing for an extended period of time and (2) due to lack of supervision, child bit another child, are unsubstantiated. Exit interview was conducted. The Notice of Site Visit was posted. Facility representative was informed that the Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to post will result in civil penalty of $100. \342\200\234The licensee was provided a copy of their appeal rights (LIC 9058) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights.\342\200\235 This report LIC 9099 was provided to the director Adriana Agreda. First level appeal is to Regional Manager, address is above on the report. (End of Report)

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 19, 2023 inspection of HAPPY FACE CHILDCARE AND PRESCHOOL INC.?

This was a complaint inspection of HAPPY FACE CHILDCARE AND PRESCHOOL INC. on October 19, 2023. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to HAPPY FACE CHILDCARE AND PRESCHOOL INC. on October 19, 2023?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.