Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

MILESTONES ACADEMY CHILDCARE CENTER, INC.License 3043714282 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

(page 2) Several parents were interviewed on 12/8/22 via phone call. From their interviews, there was nothing stated to support a preponderance of evidence for these allegations. Based on this gathered information over the course of LPA's investigation the allegations listed on LIC9099 page 1, were not determined to have a preponderance of evidence to support them. In addition to this, LPA was unable to demonstrate that these allegations or that the facility at any point in the past was out of compliance of the relevant Title 22 regulations. LPA was unable to make the determination from the information gathered that these allegations did not ever occur, or that there wasn't a preponderance of evidence to support these allegations, at some point. Due to this reasoning the most factual finding on the allegations, with all available information to LPA during the investigation are unsubstantiated. Based on all this information LPA gathered, the preponderance of evidence standard for these allegations was not met, therefore the allegations are found to be unsubstantiated. From all of the available information obtained by LPA during the course of the investigation, that there is insufficient evidence indicating that the listed allegations were valid or had a preponderance of evidence to support them. Based on all of the information LPA gathered, LPA was not able to determine that these allegations were false or untrue. Therefore LPA cannot make the determination that these allegations are unfounded; and the most accurate findings would remain at unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur; therefore, the allegations are unsubstantiated. Exit interview was conducted, and report was reviewed and discussed. Notice of Site Visit was posted during the visit. The facility representative was informed that the Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to post will result in civil penalties of $100 per day. The facility was provided a copy of their appeal rights (LIC 9058 12/15) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. (page 2) These practices of not labeling the current date on containers brought from home or placing soiled clothing/diapers in an airtight container to prevent the escape of fluids/odors is unsafe, and not within compliance of Title 22 Regulation 101427(j) and 101428(c)(1). Several parents were interviewed on 12/8/22 via phone call. From their interviews, there was nothing stated to support a preponderance of evidence for this allegation. Based on LPA's staff interviews it was determined that on occasion the facility is not labeling the current date on containers brought from home and is not always placing soiled clothing/diapers in an airtight container to prevent the escape of fluids/odors. LPA reviewed and provided director with Title 22 Regulations related to Infant Care Food Service and Infant Care Personal Services. Facility has immediately began always placing current dates on containers brought from home, and always placing soiled clothing/diapers in airtights containers; since discussion of these Title 22 Regulations. From this information from staff interviews, the preponderance of evidence to support the allegations Staff are not labeling infant bottles resulting in bottle sharing, and Staff does not place soiled clothing in airtight containers, is evident and is therefore Substantiated. Based on LPAs interviews the following violations were observed and are being cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 22 Section 101427(j) and 101428(c)(1), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Appeal Rights and deficiencies were discussed. The facility representative was provided a copy of their appeal rights (LIC 9058) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. All appeals must be in writing and received by the Regional Office within 15 business days. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the licensee

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 101427(h)Type B

    Infants who are unable to hold a bottle shall be held by a staff person or other adult for bottle feeding. At no time shall a bottle be propped for an infant. An infant shall not be allowed to carry a bottle while ambulatory. A bottle given to an infant able to hold his/her own bottle shall be unbreakable. The above was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews with staff, it was determined that on occasion staff prop bottles in an infnats mouth when feeding them. This is a potential threat to the children's health and safety.

  • 101427(j)Type B

    INFANT CARE FOOD SERVICE

    Bottles, dishes and containers of food brought by the infant's authorized representative shall be labeled with the infant's name and the current date.This was not met as evidenced by: LPA observed that the facility is not always putting the current date on food items/containers brought from home. Names are indicated but dates are not always indicated. This presents a potential threat to the children's health and safety.

  • 101428(c)(1)Type B

    The airtight container shall prevent the escape of fluids and odors and be portable enough to give to the authorized representative.This was not met as evidenced by: LPA observed that the facility is not always placing soiled diapers/clothing in an airtight container preventing the excape of fluids/odors. This presents a potential threat to the children's health and safety.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 9, 2022 inspection of MILESTONES ACADEMY CHILDCARE CENTER, INC.?

This was a complaint inspection of MILESTONES ACADEMY CHILDCARE CENTER, INC. on December 9, 2022. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to MILESTONES ACADEMY CHILDCARE CENTER, INC. on December 9, 2022?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (0 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "Infants who are unable to hold a bottle shall be held by a staff person or other adult for bottle feeding. At no time s..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.