Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

CHILDREN'S COURTYARD, THELicense 304371509
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Page 2 During the investigation LPA toured the facility, interviewed six staff, reviewed video recordings, watched live video on 3/3/2026, and obtained the facility roster. Reporting Party (RP) alleges, Staff are wearing the same gloves for multiple diaper changes. RP mentioned multiple staff are wearing the same pair of gloves during multiple diaper changes. RP mentioned the incident was observed through the facility cameras. On 02/19/2026, LPA interviewed six staff. Five staff stated they haven’t heard or witnessed staff using the same gloves for multiple diaper changes. One out of six staff interviewed mentioned they haven’t observed any staff using the same gloves for multiple diaper changes but have heard from parents, a staff member is using the same gloves for multiple diaper changes. All staff interviewed had knowledge of the diaper changing procedures. While touring the facility, LPA observed diaper changing and toileting procedures posters placed near the diaper changing stations. On 3/3/2026 LPA watched live camera footage in multiple classrooms and didn't observe staff using the same gloves during diaper changing. LPA was also able to review video recordings from February 2026 and LPA didn't observe staff using the same gloves during diaper changing. On 02/27/2026, LPA contacted 11 parents via phone call. Out of 11 parents called, LPA was able to interview four parents. Parents interviewed did not divulge any information pertaining to the allegations. Children were not interviewed during the investigation due to the nature of the allegation. Based on LPA observation, interviews with staff and parents, there is not enough evidence to substantiate the allegation. The Orange County Childcare Office has investigated the complaint alleging (1) Staff are wearing the same gloves for multiple diaper changes: although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not enough preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. In the areas that were evaluated, no deficiencies were observed of the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12 at the time of the visit. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with Director Ashley Neitzke.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 3, 2026 inspection of CHILDREN'S COURTYARD, THE?

This was a complaint inspection of CHILDREN'S COURTYARD, THE on March 3, 2026. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to CHILDREN'S COURTYARD, THE on March 3, 2026?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.