Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

EVERBROOK ACADEMYLicense 304371532
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

During the course of investigation, LPA interviewed 4 staff members, 5 children, 4 parents, and reviewed records. Regarding allegations (1) Staff yelled at day care children. LPA interviewed 4 staff members. 4 out of 4 staff members stated they have not witnessed S1 yelling at day care children. S1 stated, staff sometimes need to raise their voice when staff are trying to get children’s attention or if a child would hurt another child. Staff sometimes use a firm voice but not yelling. S2 stated, S1 will talk to children in a firm voice, for example, “no you can’t do that, because it’s not safe” and S1 has to re-direct a child because of behavior . S3 stated, S1 is sometimes serious with children . S1 is firm with them but not yelling. S3 has not witnessed S1 yelling at children in care who have bathroom accidents. S3 stated, S1 would get the gloves, and helps changing the children if they had an accident. S4 stated, S1 works well with the children. S1 always assists them. Regarding allegations (2) Staff isolated day care children. LPA interviewed 4 staff members. 4 out of 4 staff members stated they have not witnessed S1 isolate day care children. S1 stated the following: If the children misbehaved, the staff asked the children to read for 5-10 minutes. Staff would talk to the children after the children finished reading and let them go play again. Staff also redirected the children. Staff kept their eyes on the children after letting them go play. Children are not being separated. Sometimes, children need time away from the group to do their own activities. Sometimes, teachers would sit together with the children to help them focus. Teachers are always talking to the children and allowing the children to play with their friends. S2 stated, if the children were not listening or throwing toys, S1 would have the child sit at one of tables for about 5 minutes with a book or quiet toys. After 5 minutes, S1 would talk to the child about their behaviors and choices. S4 stated, Child #1 (C1) has challenging behaviors by throwing toys and objects. Staff has had a parent teacher conference with C1’s representative and staff already had a Behavioral plan for C1. Sometimes staff have had C1 work at a separate table so C1 can focus. Parents and staff have been working together and the C1 has progressed. Page 2 of 3 Regarding allegation (3) Staff did not prevent a day care child from biting other children. S1 stated they had witnessed when C1 bit another child, but the staff stopped C1 before C1 bit too hard. S4 stated, C1 has bit small nips on another child’s shirt. ABA therapist is working with C1 once a week. C1 is improving, C1 is now more verbal and socializing with the other children. C1 hasn't bitten for over 2 or 3 weeks. LPA interviewed five children, and none made any disclosures regarding the above allegations. LPA Duron interviewed 4 parents. All interviewed parents stated they did not have any concern with facility. Based on the information gathered from LPAs’ interviews, observation, and the reviewing of records, there is insufficient evidence to corroborate the allegations: Staff yelled at day care children. Staff isolated day care children, and Staff did not prevent a day care child from biting other children. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the allegations did or did not occur in the day care facility, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was completed. The report was reviewed and discussed. Appeal Rights were provided. The facility representative was provided a copy of their appeal rights and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. All appeals must be in writing and received by the Licensing office within 15 business days. Any proposed changes to the physical plant, including telephone number, shall be immediately reported to the Department. The facility representative was informed that the “Notice of Site Visit” must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to post will result in Civil Penalties of $100.00. The “Notice of Site Visit” must be posted on or adjacent to the door Page 3 of 3. End of Report.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 19, 2024 inspection of EVERBROOK ACADEMY?

This was a complaint inspection of EVERBROOK ACADEMY on September 19, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to EVERBROOK ACADEMY on September 19, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.