complaint·September 22, 2023

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jeremey McClain met with licensee Miaomiao Li to deliver findings for of a complaint investigation. Upon arrival, LPA observed care and supervision of three children. Licensee’s husband was present during today’s inspection. The following was alleged against the facility: 1) Licensee not providing adequate supervision resulting in child being inappropriately touched while in care, 2) Licensee does not allow authorized representatives to enter the daycare, and 3) Licensee does not provide adequate hydration to children in care. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews with the licensee and parents and made observations at home. Evidence gathered did not corroborate or refute the allegations. Interviews were conclusive that authorized representatives have not been denied entry when they have asked. Evidence does not suggest that licensee and or assistants are not providing adequate supervision. There was not enough evidence to suggest that children are not provided enough water or liquids throughout the day. The preponderance of evidence standard has not been met; therefore, the allegations are determined to be unsubstantiated. There were no Title 22 deficiencies resulting from the investigation. LPA reviewed this report with Licensee and provided a Notice of Site Visit, which must be posted for 30 days. LPA provided licensee with a copy of appeal rights.