complaint·August 20, 2025

Record review did not show an event where C1, and C2 could have been on the playground on 08/12/2025. Staff One (S1) was assigned as C1’s teacher prior to C1 leaving the center for kindergarten, and through interview, was aware of the choking behavior; however, only recalled a few instances that occurred within the last month. Each time that C1 had a scarf and would approach another child in a choking manner, S1 intervened and took the scarf away from C1. S1 was not sure exactly the dates that they occurred for a record review of ratio, but maintained that they were always there, and were able to intervene. Staff 2 (S2) who is C1's current teacher stated that C1 plays with a scarf but has not directly seen C1 choke another child with it, only play or attempt to play with it, with other children. 3 of 3 staff interviewed stated ratio is not a concern of children in care. There were no cameras in the facility to observe video footage. Based on interviews, a review of records, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. A finding of Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where a copy of this report along with copies of the LIC811 (Confidential Names List), Appeal Rights, and notice of site visit was provided to Director Song Ramos.