Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

KINDERCARE LEARNING CENTERLicense 334809081
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Confidential interviews disclosed communicating concerns with S1 about the incidents that occurred with C1, and S1 threw hands up in the air as if S1 didn’t know about the second incident. Other confidential interviews disclosed that C1 was not treated fairly when injured but made C1 feel like it was C1’s fault. Interview with staff stated that C3 got up to use the restroom during naptime and walked over, bent down and bit C1 on the arm, but that C1 does not like it when bad things happen to C1 because C1 is usually the one that does bad things to other kids. Interview with director, stated that there were recently two children removed for biting, but that this was not normal behavior for C2, C3, so there was no action taken in regards to the behavior, only ouch reports. Based on record review and interviews, the allegation that staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in child being injured by other children, may have occurred, however is not supported or proven by evidence. Therefore the above allegation is unsubstantiated. A copy of this report, LIC811, (Confidential Names List), and appeal rights were explained and handed to the Director, Tara Martinez. A notice of site visit was given and must be posted for 30 days.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • TEACHER-CHILD RATIO

    101216.3 (a) Teacher child ratio. There shall be a ratio of one teacher visually observing and supervising no more than 12 children in attendance…This regulation was not met as evidenced by…. Based on record review, confidential interviews, and LPA’s observation on 7/11/24, the facility has operated out of ratio on at least one or more occasion, which potentially causes a potential, health, safety and personal rights risk to children in care.

  • PERSONAL RIGHTS

    101223(a)(1) Personal Rights (a) The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights: (1) To be accorded dignity in his/her personal relationships with staff and other persons.The requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews C1 sustained a bruise approximately 2 to 3 inches in length on the upper left arm just below the shoulder. The bruise was not present when C1 was dropped off at the center but was observed while being picked up. Based on interviews conducted C1 was injured when S2 reached for the child during clean up which poses a potential risk to the health and safety of children in care. personal rights risk to children in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 12, 2024 inspection of KINDERCARE LEARNING CENTER?

This was a complaint inspection of KINDERCARE LEARNING CENTER on September 12, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to KINDERCARE LEARNING CENTER on September 12, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.