Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

KINDERCARE LEARNING CENTERLicense 3348090811 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

It was reported that children were not allowed seconds with meals and children are always hungry when returning to their home environment. Confidential interviews disclosed that the children are served food, then allowed to get seconds when requested, and if more food is necessary the staff can call the cafeteria for extra to be brought over. Other confidential interview revealed that the children do not always like the food that is served, so they may go home hungry on those days, but the facility does not offer alternatives due to the food program. Interview with director denied the children are not allowed to have seconds, the children are allowed to have thirds if requested, but sometimes the children do not want to eat what is served, but the facility has to follow the food program, and alternatives are not offered, the facility offers, breakfast, lunch, and snack. Based on interviews, the allegation that staff are not providing adequate food service to day care children may have occurred, however is not supported, or proven by evidence. Therefore, the above allegation is unsubstantiated. A copy of this report, LIC811, (Confidential Names List), and appeal rights were explained and handed to the Director, Tara Martinez. A notice of site visit was given and must be posted for 30 days. Interview with S3 admitted to saying to C1 on one occasion, because C1 was not hearing or listening to S3 when the family arrived, but S3 stated it was in a joking mannerism. Interview with Director, denied having issues with S3 in the classroom, stating the parent of C3 always has issues or complains in the office like on a daily basis. Other confidential interviews disclosed the parent of C1 has never had any issues, always friendly, involved but not rude. Based on interviews, the preponderance of evidence has been met, therefore the above allegation that staff made inappropriate comments to day care child on at least one or more occasions are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12, Chapter 1, article 7 section: 101223(a)(1) Personal Rights. A copy of this report, LIC811 (Confidential Names List), appeal rights, were reviewed and handed to Director, Tara Martinez. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • TEACHER-CHILD RATIO

    101216.3 (a) Teacher child ratio. There shall be a ratio of one teacher visually observing and supervising no more than 12 children in attendance…This regulation was not met as evidenced by…. Based on record review, confidential interviews, and LPA’s observation on 7/11/24, the facility has operated out of ratio on at least one or more occasion, which potentially causes a potential, health, safety and personal rights risk to children in care.

  • PERSONAL RIGHTS

    101223(a)(1) Personal Rights (a) The licensee shall ensure that each child is accorded the following personal rights: (1) To be accorded dignity in his/her personal relationships with staff and other persons.The requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews C1 sustained a bruise approximately 2 to 3 inches in length on the upper left arm just below the shoulder. The bruise was not present when C1 was dropped off at the center but was observed while being picked up. Based on interviews conducted C1 was injured when S2 reached for the child during clean up which poses a potential risk to the health and safety of children in care. personal rights risk to children in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 12, 2024 inspection of KINDERCARE LEARNING CENTER?

This was a complaint inspection of KINDERCARE LEARNING CENTER on September 12, 2024. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to KINDERCARE LEARNING CENTER on September 12, 2024?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "101216.3 (a) Teacher child ratio. There shall be a ratio of one teacher visually observing and supervising no more than ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.