Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

As part of this investigation, LPA interviewed staff and made direct observations of teacher to child ratios in all functioning classrooms. During this time, the facility’s staff/child ratio was found to be in compliance. LPA observed three functioning preschool classrooms, each with proper staffing/child ratios. A total of 28 children were in attendance with a total of six staff members present. LPA recorded corroborating statements from all staff members interviewed. It was stated the facility always maintains proper ratios and all staff deny they have been left alone to observe more than 12 children at any given time. It was stated the facility does not keep daily records of teacher/child ratios for individual classrooms. LPA was unable to review any supporting documents pertaining to daily classroom specific staff/child ratios. There was conflicting information received during this investigation from what was alleged. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging: Facility operating out of ratio. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted, A copy of this report and appeal rights were given to Lead Teacher, Erica Garcia during this inspection on 07/08/2024 A NOTICE OF SITE VISIT WAS GIVEN. FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE WAS INSTRUCTED TO POSTED IT IN A PROMINENT LOCATION AT THE FACILITY. FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE UNDERSTANDS THAT IT MUST REMAIN POSTED FOR THE NEXT 30 DAYS.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • ARTICLE 1. General Provisions and Definitions

    (1) Commencing September 1, 2016, a person shall not be employed or volunteer at a day care center if he or she has not been immunized against influenza, pertussis, and measles...This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA observations and records reviewed, 5 out of 6 staff present at the facility did not have proof of immunization records on file. This poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 8, 2024 inspection of ESCUELA DE LA RAZA UNIDA, INC. CHILD DEV. CTR.?

This was a complaint inspection of ESCUELA DE LA RAZA UNIDA, INC. CHILD DEV. CTR. on July 8, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to ESCUELA DE LA RAZA UNIDA, INC. CHILD DEV. CTR. on July 8, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.