Skip to main content
ReadyRule homepageReadyRule

Inspection visit

Follow-up on corrections

AGUILAR FAMILY CHILD CARELicense 3348155562 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 10/30/2024 at 12:14pm, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Jeanette Sanchez and Naomi Hurtado conducted a case management visit to address an issue which arose during a complaint investigation (Control number 10-CC-20240610122503) conducted. On 9/4/2024 at 7:10am, LPA Sanchez arrived at the facility and knocked on the door. LPA noticed movement in the facility, however view was obstructed by documents on window panes of the french doors. LPA crouched to the bottom four panes of the right side door which did not have documents posted. LPA viewed two children unattended - an infant in a car seat and an ambulatory child (record review revealed children to be 11 months old and 2 years old). Both children appeared to be watching a tv which is mounted on the same wall as the french doors. LPA knocked again. At 7:13am, LPA took photographic evidence of unsupervised children. At 7:16am, LPA took video evidence of unsupervised children. At 7:19am, LPA knocked for a third time. Staff greeted LPA. LPA asked staff how long the children had been left unattended, to which staff stated approximately 5 minutes while they retrieved toys from the adjacent playroom. LPA let staff know that she had been knocking for 10 minutes. Staff went to the playroom where the door leading into the main area of the home was open. Staff called for licensee, who was in the main house. LPA spoke with licensee regarding the children being left unsupervised and the infant being left restrained in a car seat. See LIC809D for deficiencies. An exit interview was conducted, and this report was reviewed with the licensee Silveria Aguilar. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100.

Citations

6 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 102417(a)Type B

    OPERATION OF A FAMILY CHILD CARE HOME

    (a) The licensee shall be present in the home and shall ensure that children in care are supervised at all times. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: LPA Sanchez observed children unsupervised for a period of 10 minutes, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 102423(a)(2)Type B

    PERSONAL RIGHTS

    (a) Each child ...shall have certain rights...not be waived or abridged by the licensee regardless of consent or authorization from the child's authorized representative...(2) To receive safe, healthful, and comfortable accommodations...This requirement was not met as evidenced by: LPA Sanchez observed an infant left unsupervised and restrained in a car seat for a period of 10 minutes, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 102418(g)(1)Type B

    IMMUNIZATIONS

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 4 out of 5 records, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 102425(c)Type B

    INFANT SAFE SLEEP

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that an LIC9227 was not in the file for C4, who was enrolled prior to 12 months of age. C4 is now over 12 months old. This posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 102425(j)(2)(D)Type B

    INFANT SAFE SLEEP

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that the sleep logs on file end prior to a year old, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 1597.543Type B

    Family Day Care Homes

    Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that a carbon monoxide detector was not in the daycare area, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 30, 2024 inspection of AGUILAR FAMILY CHILD CARE?

This was a other inspection of AGUILAR FAMILY CHILD CARE on October 30, 2024. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to AGUILAR FAMILY CHILD CARE on October 30, 2024?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (0 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "(a) The licensee shall be present in the home and shall ensure that children in care are supervised at all times. This r..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.