complaint·May 15, 2025

S2 relayed that S1 is very loving, and gentle with the children, and has never seen S1 do anything concerning to the children, including pulling on children\342\200\231s ears. Witness 1 (W1) works in the classroom where the alleged incident took place. W1 denied ever observing S1 pull any child\342\200\231s ear. 5 of 5 children were interviewed and all of them felt that S1 was nice, and none of them saw or had knowledge of S1 pulling on C1, or other children\342\200\231s ears. Thus, 4 of 4 staff, 1 witness, and 5 of 5 children did not corroborate the allegation. Based on interviews conducted, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. An unsubstantiated finding means that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where a copy of this report was reviewed with and provided along with a copy of the LIC811 (confidential names list), and Appeal Rights. A notice of site visit was also provided and must remain posted for 30 days.