Complaint·March 20, 2026

During interviews, some parties reported that the child’s diaper was “crunchy” and adhered to the child’s skin. Allegedly, a child developed a rash because diapers were not changed promptly. However, other interviewed parties stated that staff conduct diaper checks approximately every 1.5 to 2 hours, and that diapers are changed as needed during those checks, if found to be soiled. Information obtained through interviews was inconsistent with the allegation. Based on documentation reviewed and interviews conducted, there is conflicting information regarding the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is determined to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. An unsubstantiated finding indicates that, although the alleged incident may have occurred, there is not a preponderance of evidence to support that the violation took place. An exit interview was conducted with the licensee, Tamara Dobson. Appeal rights were discussed and provided, a copy of this report was issued, and a Notice of Site (NOS) Visit was also provided.