Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

The facility utilizes the Brightwheel application to document and communicate/notify parents/authorized representatives of any issues concerning their children. This includes any incident that the children are involved in and observed. In reviewing the child’s record/file, via Brightwheel, there was no documentation of an incident or observation of scratches during the morning health check. The only information available regarding the scratch(es), in the Brightwheel application, was a message from staff to the parent/authorized representative of the child. In the message, staff acknowledged the scratches as if they were previously there and not fresh or recent. The message did not specify what day the scratch(es) was first observed. Information was obtained but not verified, that the child had returned from winter break on 1/3/2023, with scratches on their face. Licensee disclosed that video footage from facility cameras show the child without a scratch(es) on the morning of 1/5/2023 but no video footage of the child leaving with them. Pictures were also obtained and reviewed however, those pictures that clearly show the scratch(es) on the child nose/face, were taken after 1/5/2023. Staff recalled observing and discussing the scratches at some point but could not specify what day that was. There was no clear or definite information obtained as to how or where the child may have suffered the alleged scratch(es). Based on the lack of documentation and specific information available, it was determined that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted on, or immediately adjacent to, the interior side of the main door for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the Assistant Director Jennifer Sanchez.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 101439.1(f)(1)(A)Type A

    Infant Care Center Sleeping Equipment: There shall not be anything attached to the pacifier. Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. There was a sleeping infant with a pacifier in the mouth that had a clip/holder attached. This poses/posed an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 31, 2023 inspection of STRONG FOUNDATIONS LEARNING CENTER?

This was a complaint inspection of STRONG FOUNDATIONS LEARNING CENTER on January 31, 2023. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to STRONG FOUNDATIONS LEARNING CENTER on January 31, 2023?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.