Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

LEDEZMA FAMILY CHILD CARELicense 334843599
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

In regards to children sustaining unexplained injuries, interviews and record review did not corroborate that injuries occurred at the facility which went unreported. Furthermore, record review found that a child sustained a bump on their head while in the care of the parents and not at the facility, as was alleged. In regards to the licensee withholding toilet paper, interviews did not confirm that toilet paper was intentionally withheld. However, interviews did disclose that at times a child would run out of paper but would be provided a fresh roll for replacement. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and this report was reviewed with the licensee Merery Ledezma. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • OPERATION OF A FAMILY CHILD CARE HOME

    102417 Operation of a Family Child Care Home (8) Each family child care home shall have a current roster of children...This requirement was not met as evidence by: Two children present during the inspection were not on the roster, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • PERSONAL RIGHTS

    (a) Each child...shall have certain rights...regardless of consent or authorization from the child's authorized representative. These rights include, but are not limited to, the following: (2) To receive safe, healthful, and comfortable accommodations, furnishings, and equipment This requirement was not met as evidenced by: interviews and observation, infants are being left in high chairs during periods they are not eating or playing. Infant was observed in an infant device not permitted for use in daycares. This poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 10, 2024 inspection of LEDEZMA FAMILY CHILD CARE?

This was a complaint inspection of LEDEZMA FAMILY CHILD CARE on July 10, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to LEDEZMA FAMILY CHILD CARE on July 10, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.