Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

MURRIETA UNIVERSITY, LLCLicense 334844364
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) James Wilkerson and Jessica Rubio arrived at this facility to conclude an investigation into the above allegation. LPAs toured the facility and conducted census. An initial visit was conducted on 04/25/22 and extended at that time. There is an allegation that staff are not properly supervising children because they are on their personal cell phones playing games and/or texting. During the course of this investigation interviews were conducted with staff and children. Staff state that they do use their own personal cell phones for an "app" called ProCare. Staff state that they use this "app" so they can document activities or injuries to share with parents. Staff deny that they use their personal cell phones for any other reasons and it's against the facility policy to do so. Children interviewed state that they do not know the reason that their teachers use their cell phone inside the classroom. LPAs are unable to prove or disprove the above allegation is true or not. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the allegation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted, appeal rights discussed and provided, a Notice of Site Vist posted and a copy of this report was provided to the facility on this date.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 101219(a)Type B

    Admission Agreements - (a) The licensee and the child's authorized representative shall jointly complete a current individual written admission agreement for the child. This requirement was not met as evidenced by a form requesting to take photos of a child was not signed by the parent/guardian granting that permission. S4 admitted to taking a photo of C1 to show to parent and the photo was not part of the protocol of the ProCare app. This is a potential risk to the health and safety of children in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 12, 2022 inspection of MURRIETA UNIVERSITY, LLC?

This was a complaint inspection of MURRIETA UNIVERSITY, LLC on May 12, 2022. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to MURRIETA UNIVERSITY, LLC on May 12, 2022?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.