Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

FLORES FAMILY CHILD CARELicense 334845087
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

The first allegation is Licensee is not properly supervising day care children. LPA conducted interviews with staff and children and they revealed that the Licensee has not left the childcare children in the care of any minor at any time. Further interviews revealed that Licensee only steps away into the kitchen to prepare snacks or lunch during which time the children are watched by an adult who is qualified and eligible to provide care for the children. The second allegation is Licensee is not intervening in altercations between day care children. Interviews conducted revealed that there have not been any incidents where children were involved in an altercation and the Licensee did not intervene. LPA made several attempts to contact children who made the allegations, including the parent, but was unable to make contact and obtain information regarding the alleged physical and/or verbal altercations. In addition, LPA made contact with the R/P, who was unable to provide specific details of allegations. Therefore, due to a lack of pertinent information, LPA was unable to corroborate allegation. From the information received by interviews with Licensee and children the above allegation cannot be verified. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the allegations did or did not occur, therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Ms. Maria Flores, a Notice of Site Visit posted, and a copy of this report was provided to the facility on this date and time.

Citations

5 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • PERSONNEL RECORDS

    Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in having a file for S1 for the department to review during the visit which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • OPERATION OF A FAMILY CHILD CARE HOME

    Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in keeping all cleaning compounds and other products out of reach of children which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • INFANT SAFE SLEEP

    Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in checking and logging infant sleep log every 15 mins for C1 & C2 which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. LPA provided a sample sleep log during this visit.

  • ARTICLE 2. Administration of Child Day Care Licensing

    Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in renewing the mandated reporter training which expired in March of 2024, S1 also did not have Mandated Reporter which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 1597.543Type B

    Family Day Care Homes

    Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in ensuring a working carbon Monoxide device was present inside the home which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 30, 2024 inspection of FLORES FAMILY CHILD CARE?

This was a complaint inspection of FLORES FAMILY CHILD CARE on July 30, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to FLORES FAMILY CHILD CARE on July 30, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.