Skip to main content
ReadyRule homepageReadyRule

Inspection visit

complaint

OJEDA ORTIZ FAMILY CHILD CARELicense 3363012011 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

This day was a day the Licensee was in operation and stated they had 6 children in care. Record review showed S1 did not have a cleared background on February 18, 2026. Based on interview with the Licensee, and record review, the allegation was Substantiated. A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report, LIC9099-D (deficiency page), LIC421-BG and the Appeal Rights were provided. A Notice of Site visit was given, and the Licensee understands that it must remain posted for 30 days. All interviews conducted confirm that C1’s authorized representative was notified the same day. Due to this, the allegation was found to be Unsubstantiated. A finding of Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report, was provided along with a copy of the Appeal Rights. A Notice of Site visit was given, and the Licensee understands that it must remain posted for 30 days.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 102416(d)(1)Type A

    Personnel Requirements(d) Prior to employment or initial presence in the child care home, all employees and volunteers subject to a criminal record review shall:(1) Obtain a California clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by law or Department regulations.. This requirement was not being met as evidenced by: Based on Licensee's admission, and record review, S1 was inside the facility for 3 hours while in operation assisting with children's food. This is an immediate health and safety risk to children in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 5, 2026 inspection of OJEDA ORTIZ FAMILY CHILD CARE?

This was a complaint inspection of OJEDA ORTIZ FAMILY CHILD CARE on March 5, 2026. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to OJEDA ORTIZ FAMILY CHILD CARE on March 5, 2026?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (1 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "Personnel Requirements(d) Prior to employment or initial presence in the child care home, all employees and volunteers s..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.