Skip to main content
ReadyRule homepageReadyRule

Inspection visit

complaint

LIL' SCHOOLLicense 343625410
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On June 4, 2025 Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Stephanie Piring met with Facility Representative Celest Doran to deliver complaint investigation findings. Upon arrival LPA observed 6 infants being supervised by 2 staff, 8 napping toddlers being superviesed by 2 staff, and 46 napping preschool age children being superviesd by 4 staff across 3 classrooms. It was alleged that a Child has an unexplained bruise. During the course of the investigation, LPA made observations, conducted interviews and reviewed relevant documentation. Interviews with staff, and Authorized Representatives did not reveal concern about children having unexplained bruises. Although staff did admit they did not notice a bruise until the end of the day, LPA could not determine if the bruise was a result of the staff. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with Facility Representative Celest Doran. Appeal Rights Provided. Notice of site provided.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 101216.1Type A

    (c) To be a fully qualified teacher...(1) Twelve post-secondary semester or equivalent quarter units in early childhood education or child development completed, with passing grades, at an accredited or approved college or university; and at least six months of work experience in a licensed child care center or comparable group child care program.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: based on observations and record review, the facility did not comply with the section cited above as staff observed in the classrooms do not meet the qualifications, which poses an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 101216.3(a)Type A

    TEACHER-CHILD RATIO

    Teacher-Child Ratio: (a) There shall be a ratio of one teacher visually observing and supervising no more than 12 children in attendance, except as specified in (b) and (c) below. (b) The licensee may use teacher aides in a teacher-child ratio of one teacher and one aide for every 15 children...This requirement is not met as evidenced by: based on witness statement and record review, the facility did not comply with the section cited above as staff observed in the classrooms do not meet the qualifications, which poses an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the June 4, 2025 inspection of LIL' SCHOOL?

This was a complaint inspection of LIL' SCHOOL on June 4, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to LIL' SCHOOL on June 4, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.