complaint·November 19, 2024

Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA received conflicting statements regarding the identification of the subject child and witnesses of the alleged incident. Also, there was insufficient details provided to LPA surrounding the events of the alleged incident. Further, some interviews disclosed that the alleged incident was intended to be a playful and friendly gesture. Also, some interviews disclosed that the alleged incident occurred due to frustration with the child. Due to age and limited language abilities, children were unable to qualify for interviews. LPA was not able to conduct children interviews. Further, LPA was unable to conduct interviews with all pertinent parties, due to a lack of availability. This agency has investigated the complaint regarding the above allegation. Based on the interviews conducted and documentation collected, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of unsubstantiated means, although the allegations may have happened, or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove the allegations occurred. No deficiencies were cited during this inspection. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted on, or immediately adjacent to, the interior side of the main door for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with Tracy Bierman, Director and Ann-Marie Schoben, Assistant Director.