Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

KINDERCARE LEARNING CENTERLicense 3648090881 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

LPA reviewed documentation that showed bruising on the subject infant's face. LPA also reviewed a picture that was taken by the facility of the subject infant before nap time. It was documented that this photo did not show the subject infant having a bruise. However, interviews disclosed that another infant teacher observed the bruising on the subject child after nap time. It was also disclosed that the bruise was observed on the subject infant at pick up time as well. Staff interviews consistently were unable to provide context or a explanation for what happened to the subject infant and what caused the reported bruising. Staff interviews consistently stated that during nap time, there was no crying or signs of distress from the subject infant. Overall, no one was able to explain the cause of the bruising, which proves the reported allegation to be true. Based on interviews of pertinent individuals that were conducted, and observations that were made, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be Substantiated. A copy of this report must be made available for the next three years. See LIC 9099-D for cited deficiency.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • RESPONSIBILITY FOR PROVIDING CARE AND SUPERVISION FOR INFANTS

    101429 - Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision for Infants(1) Each infant shall be constantly supervised and under direct visual observation and supervision by a staff person at all times.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: During pertinent interviews, it was found that no staff was able to explain the cause of the bruising, which proves the reported allegation to be true.

  • 101416.5(a)(b)Type A

    101416.5 - Staff-Infant Ratio(b) There shall be a ratio of one teacher for every four infants in attendance.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on pertinent interviews conducted and documentation reviewed, it was revealed that the facility operated out of ratio in the infant classroom for a limited amount of time. It was revealed that this incident occured during drop-off time in the morning.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 26, 2025 inspection of KINDERCARE LEARNING CENTER?

This was a complaint inspection of KINDERCARE LEARNING CENTER on November 26, 2025. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to KINDERCARE LEARNING CENTER on November 26, 2025?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "101429 - Responsibility for Providing Care and Supervision for Infants(1) Each infant shall be constantly supervised and..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.