Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Based on observation and interviews the renovations were being conducted after the hours the daycare was operating and there were no reports of children being ill during the time frame the renovation occurred and the orange classroom was not being used. The evidence does not corroborate with the allegation. Therefore, both the above allegations are Unsubstantiated, meaning the allegations may have happened or are valid, but there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove the alleged violations occurred. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was read, a Notice of Site Visit, and this report were provided to Katrina Henderson, Site Director, at the facility. A Notice of Site Visit must remain posted for 30 days. Removal of the posting is subject to a $100 civil penalty.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 101237(a)Type B

    ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING BUILDINGS OR NEW FACILITIES

    101237(a) Alterations to Existing Buildings or New Facilities-(a)Prior to construction or alterations, the licensee shall notify the Department of the proposed change(s). This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interview the facility made alterations to the ceiling without prior notification to the Licensing Department which posed a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to the persons in care.

  • 101239(d)Type B

    101239(d) Fixtures, Furniture, Equipment and Supplies-(d)The licensee shall provide lamps or lights as necessary in all rooms and other areas to ensure the comfort and safety of all persons in the child care center. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation the school aged children were sitting in their area in the dark because the main lights were off due to preschool children napping. There were no other lighting options observed during the inspection which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to the persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 15, 2025 inspection of KIDS AND CARE PRESCHOOL AND DAY CARE CENTER?

This was a complaint inspection of KIDS AND CARE PRESCHOOL AND DAY CARE CENTER on January 15, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to KIDS AND CARE PRESCHOOL AND DAY CARE CENTER on January 15, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.