Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

KINDERCARE LEARNING CENTERLicense 364844526
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed the bus driver who transported both subject children on the date of the alleged incident. The bus driver stated they did not observe the alleged incident, did not hear any reaction related to the alleged incident, and no child made a report to them at the time. The bus driver further stated the first time they became aware of the allegation was after the fact, when it was brought to their attention by facility management. LPA also conducted interviews with both subject children. During the interviews, the subject children provided differing accounts regarding whether the allegation occurred. Due to the receipt of the allegation, the facility implemented preventative measures to reduce the likelihood of further concerns and to ensure increased supervision and separation of the subject children. Facility corrective actions implemented included: \342\200\242 The facility ensured both subject children are separated during classroom time and while on the bus. \342\200\242 The facility ensured the subject children are not together at any time while in care. \342\200\242 The facility ensured both subject children are placed on separate buses when possible. \342\200\242 The facility rearranged the classroom environment to increase separation and supervision. \342\200\242 The facility adjusted bus seating so the aisle separates boys and girls, ensuring each group has their own side. \342\200\242 The facility arranged for a business partner to provide training to school-age children regarding body autonomy, hands to self, and personal space. \342\200\242 Staff were informed of the supervision expectations and the requirement to maintain separation between the subject children. Continued on LIC 9099-C. This agency has investigated the complaint regarding the above allegation. Based on interviews conducted, documentation reviewed, and the absence of corroborating evidence, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation occurred. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. A Notice of Site Visit was provided and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to maintain posting as required will result in a civil penalty of $100.00. An exit interview was conducted, and the report was reviewed with Director Charmaine Foree.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 23, 2026 inspection of KINDERCARE LEARNING CENTER?

This was a complaint inspection of KINDERCARE LEARNING CENTER on January 23, 2026. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to KINDERCARE LEARNING CENTER on January 23, 2026?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.