complaint·March 15, 2021

Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. The following was alleged: Day care staff are not notifying the child's authorized representative of less serious injuries. LPA investigated the above allegation and gathered the following information: Director and Staff interviews corroborate the facility is responsible to report injuries and incidents to authorized representatives of children. Director provided LPA with a notebook labeled “Incident Report Logbook”. LPA’s observation and review of Incident Report Logbook provided proof of the documentation of children injuries or behavioral issues that occur in the facility. Director stated all incidents logged are verbally discussed with authorized representatives. The evidence collected was not sufficient to substantiate or refute the above allegation. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED . The following was alleged: Nail polish and nail polisher remover accessible to day care children. LPA investigated the above allegation and gathered the following information: Interviews with Facility Director and Day Care Staff state nail polish and nail polish remover are not made accessible to children in care. Director stated, in the past, nail polish and nail polish remover were brought to the facility by staff and utilized during supervised activities with day care children. The nail polish and nail polish remover were not stored in the classroom before or after its use. LPA toured the facility inside and out and did not observe nail polish or nail polish remover stored in the facility at the time of inspection. The evidence collected was not sufficient to substantiate or refute the above allegation. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED . Continued on LIC9099-C AT THE TIME OF VISIT NO DEFICIENCIES WERE CITED An exit interview was conducted, LPA provided Facility Director with a copy of this report via email, along with an electronic “read receipt”. The electronic read receipt or reply to the email acknowledges receipt of this report. A NOTICE OF SITE VISIT WAS EMAILED. DIRECTOR WAS INSTRUCTED POSTED IT IN A PROMINENT LOCATION AT THE FACILITY. THE DIRECTOR UNDERSTANDS THAT IT MUST REMAIN POSTED FOR THE NEXT 30 DAYS. A copy of this report and appeal rights were emailed to the Director during this Tele-inspection on 03/15/2021 and must be made available to the public upon request for the next 3 years.