complaint·September 22, 2023

Also, Staff 1(S1), that was supervising the child (Neptune) had opened the door and was watching where the child was until staff lost view. Staff 2 (S2) indicated that they were outside with C1 when the child had left the classroom (Neptune). When the child arrived at Saturn, the child was then returned by staff to the child's classroom (Neptune). The decision was made to move C1 back to the child's original classroom, (Uranus), where the child was familiar. LPA observed C1 to be content and following directions. Therefore, due to conflicting information found throughout this investigation this agency has investigated the complaint alleging: Facility staff not providing adequate supervision to child in care. Although the allegation may have happened, or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A NOTICE OF SITE VISIT WAS GIVEN. DIRECTOR WAS INSTRUCTED TO POSTED IT IN A PROMINENT LOCATION AT THE FACILITY. THE DIRECTOR UNDERSTANDS THAT IT MUST REMAIN POSTED FOR THE NEXT 30 DAYS. An exit interview was conducted, A copy of this report were given to the Director, Natasha Abuata during this visit.