complaint·October 31, 2023

Staff indicated that they did not see the solid food Tupperware and proceeded to give I1 puree, which is the back up if no food is brought for that day. RP immediately called the Director and indicated that RP seen the teacher on the camera in the classroom give I1 puree instead of the solid food that was in the refrigerator. I1 had already completed the pureed food, the solid food was not given on that day. Upon review of the infant feeding plan, it was stated that "around 12pm" solid food is to be given to I1. Based on the miscommunication between staff and the RP about the food being placed in a different location, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Although the allegation may have happened, or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. A NOTICE OF SITE VISIT WAS GIVEN. DIRECTOR WAS INSTRUCTED TO POSTED IT IN A PROMINENT LOCATION AT THE FACILITY. THE DIRECTOR UNDERSTANDS THAT IT MUST REMAIN POSTED FOR THE NEXT 30 DAYS. An exit interview was conducted, A copy of this report were given to the Director, Margaret Gale Van Duzer during this visit.