complaint·December 1, 2022

Therefore, this individual obtained a California Driver License with her facility address during the transition of her processing her daycare license, but this individual does not reside at the facility. During the physical inspection at the facility, LPA observed male clothing and belongings; license explained that clothing belongs to a deceased family member and she wanted to conserve it. Licensee provided documentation to CCL under penalty of perjury denying any additional individual(s) residing on home and/or staying during daycare hours while children are in care. LPAs informed the licensee that all adults who work, reside or volunteer at the facility must receive a criminal record clearance/exemption prior to working, residing and/or volunteering at the facility. After a thorough review of the information obtained, there is conflicting information obtained from pertinent parties. However, no additional witnesses nor additional evidence corroborate the allegation that the adult in question is physically present at the facility during business hours.\302\240 Therefore, based on the information gather, there is not enough facts to corroborate the reported allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with licensee, Ebony Green. Appeal rights were discussed, and a notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days.\302\240 Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. This report must be available to the public for three years.