complaint·March 12, 2025

Further, it was stated that this lack of diaper changes led to the mentioned child developing a diaper rash. For further context, it was stated that the mentioned child has never had a diaper rash before. It was also added that the mentioned child would be at the facility for 8-9 hours per day. Licensee Gutierrez stated that the mentioned child arrived at the facility with what appeared to be a diaper rash. Further, Licensee stated that she informed the child\342\200\231s parent during afternoon pick up of the alleged rash. The following day, Licensee stated that she was informed by the child\342\200\231s parent that the child was examined by a physician and that the child did not sustain a diaper rash. However, the Licensee\342\200\231s interview revealed that she changes and/or conducts diaper changes 2 to 3 times in the morning and the 2 times in the afternoon, which comes out to a total of 4 to 5 diaper changes/checks per child, per day. Lastly, it was stated that the Licensee does not keep track of diaper changes on a log. The Department was unable to determine if the alleged diaper rash occurred, and if it occurred at the facility or not. This agency has investigated the complaint regarding the above allegation. Conflicting statements were received throughout the course of the investigation. Based on the interviews conducted and documentation collected, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of unsubstantiated means, although the allegations may have happened, or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove the allegations occurred. No deficiencies were cited during this inspection. A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted on, or immediately adjacent to, the interior side of the main door for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with Emely Gutierrez, Licensee.