Skip to main content
ReadyRule homepageReadyRule

Inspection visit

complaint

WIMBERLY, AMY FAMILY CHILD CARELicense 3761003412 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 12/15/21 @ 10:25AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nancy Diaz conducted an unannounced inspection to deliver the findings to the above allegation. Observed present today were 9 children with Mrs. Wimberly and helper Lisa Lancaster. Children were observed engaged in circle time. During the course of investigation, LPA conducted interviews with the licensee, helper and parents of children in care. Based on LPA interviews with the licensee, helper and parents, the licensee did not follow CDSS/CDPH Covid-19 guidelines/recommendations when Mrs. Wimberly and her husband tested positive for COVID-19. Mrs. Wimberly failed to isolate/quarantine staff/children. Mrs. Wimberly also failed to report this incident to the department. Based on LPAs interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore the findings is substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12 are being cited on the attached lic 9099D. This poses a potential health and safety risk to children in care. Type B deficiency are cited. Exit interview was conducted with Mrs. Wimberly. Appeal rights were provided. Notice of site visit was observed posted. This shall remain posted for 30 days.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1012416.2(c)(3)Type B

    REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. In addition to the events specified in Health and Safety Code Sections 1597.467(b)(1)(A) through (b)(1)(C), the licensee shall report the following events to the Department: A communicable disease outbreak when determined by the local health authority. This requirement was not met as evidenced by:Based on interviews conducted with the licensee, helper and parents of children in care, Mrs. Wimberly failed to report to the department and County Public Health cases of COVID-19 positive.

  • 102423(a)(2)Type B

    PERSONAL RIGHTS

    PERSONAL RIGHTS.To receive safe, healthful, and comfortable accommodations, furnishings, and equipment. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted by the LPA, Mrs. Wimberly failed to isolate/quarantine staff/children when she developed symptoms for COVID-19 virus. Mrs. Wimberly and her husband were both tested positive for COVID-19.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 15, 2021 inspection of WIMBERLY, AMY FAMILY CHILD CARE?

This was a complaint inspection of WIMBERLY, AMY FAMILY CHILD CARE on December 15, 2021. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to WIMBERLY, AMY FAMILY CHILD CARE on December 15, 2021?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (0 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. In addition to the events specified in Health and Safety Code Sections 1597.467(b)(1)(A) throug..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.