Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Secondly, it was also alleged that staff did not provide a safe and comfortable environment for daycare child. Specifically, that C1 was being disruptive in class by moving furniture, throwing toys, and breaking a flower vase. Photos were provided to parent of C1 on top of classroom furniture, instead of removing the child or preventing C1 from destroying the class further. Observation, interview, and record reviewed confirmed that C1 previously had a Behavior Therapist (BT) when C1 was present at the CCC. In June, the BT was taken off the case by C1 parents and C1 still attended without a BT. Records reviewed also confirmed that C1 was without a BT for a full month, leading up to the incident on July 23, 2024. Based on observations and interviews, C1 currently engages in tantrums and aggressive behaviors as a method to get needs met and is not able to effectively communicate to adult’s and peers. Four of four interviews confirmed that C1 will engage in biting and hitting other peers when they have a toy C1 wants or take a toy that they were playing with. While tantrums are age appropriate for C1 age, the intensity in which C1 engages in these behaviors has resulted in C1 being removed from other daycare’s and isolated from other peers their age. The CCC did attempt to accommodate C1 needs and behaviors when BT was present, however, due to ratios and staffing, CCC staff are not equipped to continuously remove a child from a classroom. Based on interviews and record review, LPA is unable to corroborate the allegations staff did not prevent daycare child from being bullied by another child and staff did not provide a safe and comfortable environment for daycare child. These allegations may have occurred; however, they are not supported, or proven by evidence. Therefore, the above allegations are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, a copy of this report, appeal rights, along with a Notice of Site Visit was handed to Shannon Spencer. Notice of Site Visit must remain posted for 30 consecutive days in a prominent place, visible to families and caregivers.

Citations

4 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 101216.1(c)(1)(A)Type B

    Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in one out of four staff files audited. Where Staff 3 did not have record of a ECE curriculum course on file. Which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • TEACHER-CHILD RATIO

    Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above where staff 3 is left alone int he frogs classroom two days a week. Where which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • IMMUNIZATIONS

    Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in one out of five child files audited. Where child 3 was missing proof of current immunizations. Which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 101220(a)Type B

    CHILD'S MEDICAL ASSESSMENTS

    Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in two out of five child files audited. Where child 2 and 3 were missing verification of a physician report made within thirty days of enrollment. Which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 19, 2024 inspection of CHILDREN'S CHOICE ACADEMY - VISTA?

This was a complaint inspection of CHILDREN'S CHOICE ACADEMY - VISTA on September 19, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to CHILDREN'S CHOICE ACADEMY - VISTA on September 19, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand add your response to the public record. Free.

Spotted an inaccuracy on this visit?Request a reviewand we will check it against the public record.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 20-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.