Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

KINDERCARE ROTHGARD - INFANTLicense 376600311
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

It was alleged that an infant sustained unexplained injury while in care. Facility Representative and staff denied the allegation. The Facility Representative and staff stated that incident reports are provided to daycare parents for injuries and incidents that occur at the facility; and that are observed by staff. Facility Representative and staff acknowledged that they observed daycare child in question had what they considered a medical concern; however it was not related to an injury or an incident. Facility Representative and staff stated that the authorized representative of the daycare child in question was contacted immediately and the child was picked up from the facility. Based on interviews conducted and review of medical documentation, there were no disclosures that collaborated that an infant sustained unexplained injury while in care. Due to conflicting interview statements the allegation is found to be unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. No deficiencies cited. A Notice of Site Visit (LIC 9213) was given to Facility Representative, Celia Carrizosa and must remain posted on, or immediately adjacent to, the interior side of the main door for 30 days. Appeal Rights (LIC 9058) were provided. An exit interview conducted, and report was reviewed with Facility Representative, Celia Carrizosa.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 101161(a)Type A

    LIMITATIONS ON CAPACITY

    Based on observation, interview, record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that LPA observed the facility operating beyond the capacity limitations specified on the license in that 24 infants were present during the time of inspection which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 2, 2025 inspection of KINDERCARE ROTHGARD - INFANT?

This was a complaint inspection of KINDERCARE ROTHGARD - INFANT on July 2, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to KINDERCARE ROTHGARD - INFANT on July 2, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.