complaint·September 29, 2023

always there to assist with the day care. In addition, they have an Assistant, who resides at the home and helps the Licensee with the day care children. Children interviewed were unclear about capacity and ratios, but they did confirm that the attendees do not always come to day care. Also, they confirmed that licensee is never there alone with them. LPA checked Mr. Cuevas and the Assistant's file and observed they both have required personnel paperwork. LPA was unable to interview C1 due to refusal by parent. Based on interviews conducted and record review, the allegations that Provider speaks inappropriately to day care child, and Provider is operating out of ratio , may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights were discussed and provided to Licensee Caritina Cuevas on this date. A NOTICE OF SITE VISIT WAS ISSUED AND LPA VERIFIED THAT IT WAS POSTED IN A PROMINENT LOCATION AT THE FACILITY BEFORE LEAVING. THE LICENSEE UNDERSTANDS THAT IT MUST REMAIN POSTED FOR THE NEXT 30 DAYS